Message ID | 20200527164655.177741-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series |
|
Related | show |
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 22:16 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > I believe some boards can directly enable DM_SPI if it has > OF_CONTROL enabled already, so now it's the last call for > board maintainers to take care of this. > > Now all boards which are using fsl_espi are removed due to > no action on dm conversion from years. hmm, last I heard fsl_espi was beeing rewritten by NXP, is that not so anymore? We use fsl_espi on our custom boards, but we are behind a bit ATM Jocke
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:08 AM Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 22:16 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > I believe some boards can directly enable DM_SPI if it has > > OF_CONTROL enabled already, so now it's the last call for > > board maintainers to take care of this. > > > > Now all boards which are using fsl_espi are removed due to > > no action on dm conversion from years. > > hmm, last I heard fsl_espi was being rewritten by NXP, is that not so anymore? Do you mean the FlexSPI controller is a replacement? > We use fsl_espi on our custom boards, but we are behind a bit ATM So, then fsl_espi is no more requirement to use it in Mainline or nobody care about it isn't it? Jagan.
Hi Jagan, On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:47 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > I believe some boards can directly enable DM_SPI if it has > OF_CONTROL enabled already, so now it's the last call for > board maintainers to take care of this. > > Now all boards which are using fsl_espi are removed due to > no action on dm conversion from years. > > These will merge as soon as possible, based on the response. > > Travis-CI: > https://travis-ci.org/github/openedev/u-boot-amarula/builds/691819005 > > Any inputs? > Jagan. > > Jagan Teki (24): > arm: Remove configs/B4420QDS_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/BSC9131RDB_NAND_SYSCLK100_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/BSC9132QDS_NAND_DDRCLK100_SECURE_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/C29XPCIE_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/Cyrus_P5020_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/MPC8536DS_36BIT_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND_SECBOOT_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P1022DS_36BIT_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P2041RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P3041DS_NAND_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1024QDS_DDR4_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1040D4RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1040QDS_DDR4_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T2080QDS_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T2080RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T4160QDS_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T4160RDB_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/TWR-P1025_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/controlcenterd_36BIT_SDCARD_DEVELOP_defconfig > board > arm: Remove configs/kmcoge4_defconfig board > spi: Zap fsl_espi > mtd: spi: Drop fsl_espi_spl All these boards are powerpc, not arm. So the tag of these patches should be fixed to use powerpc. Regards, Bin
>-----Original Message----- >From: U-Boot <u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Jagan Teki >Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:17 PM >To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> >Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com; Jagan Teki ><jagan@amarulasolutions.com> >Subject: [PATCH 00/24] spi: dm-conversion (part2) > >I believe some boards can directly enable DM_SPI if it has >OF_CONTROL enabled already, so now it's the last call for >board maintainers to take care of this. > >Now all boards which are using fsl_espi are removed due to >no action on dm conversion from years. > >These will merge as soon as possible, based on the response. > >Travis-CI: >https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftravis- >ci.org%2Fgithub%2Fopenedev%2Fu-boot- >amarula%2Fbuilds%2F691819005&data=02%7C01%7Cpriyanka.jain%40 >nxp.com%7C171852fb35434a5d673408d8025dac41%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f >a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637261948643488219&sdata=9QAJ >qHESjU3J%2FEvB38hpxhtjaQwKfeVQppe73jPzXag%3D&reserved=0 > >Any inputs? >Jagan. > >Jagan Teki (24): > arm: Remove configs/B4420QDS_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/BSC9131RDB_NAND_SYSCLK100_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/BSC9132QDS_NAND_DDRCLK100_SECURE_defconfig >board > arm: Remove configs/C29XPCIE_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/Cyrus_P5020_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/MPC8536DS_36BIT_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND_SECBOOT_defconfig >board > arm: Remove configs/P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P1022DS_36BIT_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P2041RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/P3041DS_NAND_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1024QDS_DDR4_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1040D4RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T1040QDS_DDR4_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T2080QDS_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T2080RDB_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T4160QDS_NAND_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/T4160RDB_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/TWR-P1025_defconfig board > arm: Remove configs/controlcenterd_36BIT_SDCARD_DEVELOP_defconfig > board > arm: Remove configs/kmcoge4_defconfig board > spi: Zap fsl_espi > mtd: spi: Drop fsl_espi_spl > <snip> Dear Jagan, NXP do plan to keep maintaining some of the powerpc boards. We had send espi series of patches for DM migration last year http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=127282&state=* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=138873 But they could not be merged due to dependency on other patches https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20190813134731.25024-1-lukma@denx.de/ Now we have taken agreement from original author of dependent patches (Lukasz Majewski) and will be sending the combined series of espi DM migration next week. So, please don't remove these boards Thanks Priyanka
Hi Bin, On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:26 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jagan, > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:47 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > I believe some boards can directly enable DM_SPI if it has > > OF_CONTROL enabled already, so now it's the last call for > > board maintainers to take care of this. > > > > Now all boards which are using fsl_espi are removed due to > > no action on dm conversion from years. > > > > These will merge as soon as possible, based on the response. > > > > Travis-CI: > > https://travis-ci.org/github/openedev/u-boot-amarula/builds/691819005 > > > > Any inputs? > > Jagan. > > > > Jagan Teki (24): > > arm: Remove configs/B4420QDS_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/BSC9131RDB_NAND_SYSCLK100_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/BSC9132QDS_NAND_DDRCLK100_SECURE_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/C29XPCIE_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/Cyrus_P5020_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/MPC8536DS_36BIT_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND_SECBOOT_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P1022DS_36BIT_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P2041RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P3041DS_NAND_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1024QDS_DDR4_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1040D4RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1040QDS_DDR4_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T2080QDS_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T2080RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T4160QDS_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T4160RDB_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/TWR-P1025_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/controlcenterd_36BIT_SDCARD_DEVELOP_defconfig > > board > > arm: Remove configs/kmcoge4_defconfig board > > spi: Zap fsl_espi > > mtd: spi: Drop fsl_espi_spl > > All these boards are powerpc, not arm. So the tag of these patches > should be fixed to use powerpc. Thanks for the catch, will update it. Jagan.
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 3:14 PM Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: U-Boot <u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Jagan Teki > >Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:17 PM > >To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> > >Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com; Jagan Teki > ><jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > >Subject: [PATCH 00/24] spi: dm-conversion (part2) > > > >I believe some boards can directly enable DM_SPI if it has > >OF_CONTROL enabled already, so now it's the last call for > >board maintainers to take care of this. > > > >Now all boards which are using fsl_espi are removed due to > >no action on dm conversion from years. > > > >These will merge as soon as possible, based on the response. > > > >Travis-CI: > >https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftravis- > >ci.org%2Fgithub%2Fopenedev%2Fu-boot- > >amarula%2Fbuilds%2F691819005&data=02%7C01%7Cpriyanka.jain%40 > >nxp.com%7C171852fb35434a5d673408d8025dac41%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f > >a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637261948643488219&sdata=9QAJ > >qHESjU3J%2FEvB38hpxhtjaQwKfeVQppe73jPzXag%3D&reserved=0 > > > >Any inputs? > >Jagan. > > > >Jagan Teki (24): > > arm: Remove configs/B4420QDS_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/BSC9131RDB_NAND_SYSCLK100_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/BSC9132QDS_NAND_DDRCLK100_SECURE_defconfig > >board > > arm: Remove configs/C29XPCIE_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/Cyrus_P5020_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/MPC8536DS_36BIT_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P1010RDB-PA_36BIT_NAND_SECBOOT_defconfig > >board > > arm: Remove configs/P1020MBG-PC_36BIT_SDCARD_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P1022DS_36BIT_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P2041RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/P3041DS_NAND_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1024QDS_DDR4_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1040D4RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T1040QDS_DDR4_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T2080QDS_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T2080RDB_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T4160QDS_NAND_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/T4160RDB_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/TWR-P1025_defconfig board > > arm: Remove configs/controlcenterd_36BIT_SDCARD_DEVELOP_defconfig > > board > > arm: Remove configs/kmcoge4_defconfig board > > spi: Zap fsl_espi > > mtd: spi: Drop fsl_espi_spl > > > <snip> > Dear Jagan, > > NXP do plan to keep maintaining some of the powerpc boards. > We had send espi series of patches for DM migration last year > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=127282&state=* > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=138873 > > But they could not be merged due to dependency on other patches > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20190813134731.25024-1-lukma@denx.de/ > > Now we have taken agreement from original author of dependent patches (Lukasz Majewski) and will be sending the combined series of espi DM migration next week. > > So, please don't remove these boards Yes, hopefully this would be last call. Anyway, will pause requested boards till first week of MW others will go this release itself. Jagan.