| Message ID | 20191231130528.20669-7-jagan@amarulasolutions.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series |
|
| Related | show |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 06:35:25PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > The MIPI DSI PHY controller on Allwinner R40 is similar > on the one on A31. > > Add R40 compatible and append A31 compatible as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > --- > Changes for v3: > - update the binding in new yaml format > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > index 8841938050b2..0c283fe79402 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: > oneOf: > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy > - items: > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy This isn't doing what you say it does. Here you're stating that there's two valid values, one that is a single element allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, and another which is a list of three elements allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy, allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy and allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, in that order. Did you run make dtbs_check and dt_bindings_check? Maxime
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:33 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 06:35:25PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > The MIPI DSI PHY controller on Allwinner R40 is similar > > on the one on A31. > > > > Add R40 compatible and append A31 compatible as fallback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > --- > > Changes for v3: > > - update the binding in new yaml format > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > > index 8841938050b2..0c283fe79402 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: > > oneOf: > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy > > - items: > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy > > This isn't doing what you say it does. > > Here you're stating that there's two valid values, one that is a > single element allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, and another which is a > list of three elements allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy, > allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy and allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, in > that order. I got it Maxime, thanks for pointing this. > > Did you run make dtbs_check and dt_bindings_check? I sure I didn't, thanks for the clue. Will do this on another patch as well. Jagan.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml index 8841938050b2..0c283fe79402 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: oneOf: - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy - items: + - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy
The MIPI DSI PHY controller on Allwinner R40 is similar on the one on A31. Add R40 compatible and append A31 compatible as fallback. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> --- Changes for v3: - update the binding in new yaml format .../devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)